>本社要闻
【写作任务及详细赛程】2021第一届“爱未来杯”全国高校英语写作同伴互评 (Peerceptiv)教学大赛
发布日期 : 2022-04-15 点击量:11277

 

 
阶段
时间
时长
一稿任务发布
5月8日0:00
 
一稿作业提交
5月8日至5月12日23:59
4天
一稿作文同伴互评
5月13日至5月17日23:59
4天
一稿同伴回评
5月18日至5月21日23:59
3天
 
 
 
二稿作业提交
5月23日至5月27日23:59
4天
二稿作文同伴互评
5月28日至6月1日23:59
4天
二稿同伴回评
6月2日至6月5日23:59
3天
 
 
 
专家评审
6月6日至6月15日
9天
 
Writing Directions: harmonious family relationship is the starting point of one’s happiness, and having a pleasant family atmosphere is vital to the growth and development of a child. Meanwhile, family education, especially early childhood family education, is an important part of one’s education. We invite you to write an essay on family education with at least 180 words but no more than 250 words. Be sure to include:
What is family education in your opinion?
Apart from social and school education, what role does family education play in one’s growth and development?
What kind of family education have you experienced? What does it mean to you and how does it influence you?
What is your ideal family education?
KeywordsFamily education; My Parents and Me; Ideal Family education
 
 
好的家庭关系是一个人幸福的起点,好的家庭氛围对孩子的成长至关重要。家庭教育,尤其是早期家庭教育是个人教育经历的重要一环。请结合自身成长经历,从以下方面谈一谈你对家庭教育的认识。作文篇幅至少达到180个英文单词,不超过250个词。
第一,你认为什么是家庭教育? 
第二,除了社会教育和学校教育之外,你认为家庭教育对一个人的成长和发展有什么重要作用或意义?
第三,在你的成长过程中,你经历过什么样的家庭教育?对你的成长有什么影响?
第四,你理想的家庭教育是什么样的?
关键词:家庭教育;父母与我;理想的家庭教育
 
Review RubricsComments and ratings should consider four dimensions: content, organization, language, and mechanics. Within each dimension, the detailed instructions on commenting and rating are given as shown in Table 1.
 
Table 1 Review Rubrics
No.
Dimensions
Description of dimension:
Commenting on the response to the prompt (with “●”) and Rating the response to the prompt (with “)
1
Content
Is there a thesis statement on family education in the essay? Is the thesis statement well supported? Are there sentences or details that do not support the thesis statement and therefore should be eliminated or rewritten? Be specific about your suggestion.
 Thesis: Is the thesis statement about family education stated clearly? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-The thesis statement is not clear.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-The thesis statement is somewhat clear.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-The thesis statement stands out.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-The thesis statement is clearly stated.
 
 
 
 Thesis: Is the thesis adequately supported in each paragraph? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-Not supported.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-Somewhat supported.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Mostly supported.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Fully supported.
 
 Relevance: Are relevant personal experiences developed regarding family education? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-Not relevant OR not enough to evaluate.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-A little bit relevant.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Mostly relevant to family education.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Relevant to the assigned topic.
 
2
Organization
COHERENCE: Do transitional words and phrases help make the sentences and paragraphs coherent? Please be specific about your suggestion.
 
 Coherence: Are the paragraphs organized coherently? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-In random, repetitive, or illogical ways.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-With jumps in logic, or repetition.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Somewhat coherently.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Coherently.
 
 Coherence: Are the sentences in each paragraph organized coherently? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-In random, repetitive, or illogical ways.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-With jumps in logic, or repetition.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Somewhat coherently.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Coherently.
 
 Cohesion: How well are transitional words and phrases used? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-A very limited range of transitional words and phrases are used.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-Many inadequate transitional words and phrases are used.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Most transitional words and phrases are used appropriately.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Transitional words and phrases are used appropriately.
 
3
Language
WORDING AND SENTENCE SKILLS: Is the essay concise? Are there a variety of sentence structures in the essay? Are there any errors regarding gender, tense, agreement, comparative construction, non-predicate verb, parallel structure, inconsistent point of view in the essay? Please describe the type of problem including the location of one instance and how they should be fixed.
 
 
 Word ChoiceWords convey the intended message in a specific, precise, and engaging manner. #weight=1
Rating 1: Words are too limited or difficult to understand.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: Many words are not understandable.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: Most words are understandable and specific in this context.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: Words are specific, precise and engaging.
 
 Word CountDoes the essay meet the requirement of word tokens? #weight=1
Rating 1: Less than 100 words.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: At least 100 words but less than 140 words.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: At least 140 words but less than 180 words.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: At least 180 words and no more than 250 words.
 
 Sentence Structure: Are there a variety of sentence structures in the essay? #weight=1
Rating 1: A very limited range of sentence structures.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: A limited range of sentence structures with some improper usages.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: A variety of sentence structures with few errors.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: A wide range of sentence structures with full flexibility and accuracy.
 
4
Mechanics
Are there any common problems in terms of punctuation, spellingcapitalization, paragraphing in the essay? Please describe the type of problem including the location of one instance and indicate how it should be fixed.
 Writing Convention: Standard writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing) are used effectively to enhance readability in the essay. #weight=1
Rating 1: There are many serious errors in standard writing conventions; these errors frequently obscure meaning.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: There are occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in standard writing conventions; these errors can interfere with meaning. Three to five errors might occur per paragraph.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: There is one or two errors in standard writing conventions per paragraph.
Rating 6: 6​​
Rating 7: There is few or no errors in standard writing conventions per paragraph.

 

附件:

第一届参赛资源包(点击下载)

第二届参赛资源包(点击下载)

 

 
 
 

  

上海外语音像出版社 沪ICP备2021036861号-1
版权所有 技术支持上海秦王网络
网络出版服务许可证 (署)网出证(沪)字第073号