阶段
|
时间
|
时长
|
一稿任务发布
|
5月8日0:00
|
|
一稿作业提交
|
5月8日至5月12日23:59
|
4天
|
一稿作文同伴互评
|
5月13日至5月17日23:59
|
4天
|
一稿同伴回评
|
5月18日至5月21日23:59
|
3天
|
|
|
|
二稿作业提交
|
5月23日至5月27日23:59
|
4天
|
二稿作文同伴互评
|
5月28日至6月1日23:59
|
4天
|
二稿同伴回评
|
6月2日至6月5日23:59
|
3天
|
|
|
|
专家评审
|
6月6日至6月15日
|
9天
|
No.
|
Dimensions
|
Description of dimension:
Commenting on the response to the prompt (with “●”) and Rating the response to the prompt (with “◆”)
|
1
|
Content
|
l Is there a thesis statement on family education in the essay? Is the thesis statement well supported? Are there sentences or details that do not support the thesis statement and therefore should be eliminated or rewritten? Be specific about your suggestion.
u Thesis: Is the thesis statement about family education stated clearly? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-The thesis statement is not clear.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-The thesis statement is somewhat clear.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-The thesis statement stands out.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-The thesis statement is clearly stated.
u Thesis: Is the thesis adequately supported in each paragraph? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-Not supported.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-Somewhat supported.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Mostly supported.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Fully supported.
u Relevance: Are relevant personal experiences developed regarding family education? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-Not relevant OR not enough to evaluate.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-A little bit relevant.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Mostly relevant to family education.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Relevant to the assigned topic.
|
2
|
Organization
|
l COHERENCE: Do transitional words and phrases help make the sentences and paragraphs coherent? Please be specific about your suggestion.
u Coherence: Are the paragraphs organized coherently? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-In random, repetitive, or illogical ways.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-With jumps in logic, or repetition.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Somewhat coherently.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Coherently.
u Coherence: Are the sentences in each paragraph organized coherently? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-In random, repetitive, or illogical ways.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-With jumps in logic, or repetition.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Somewhat coherently.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Coherently.
u Cohesion: How well are transitional words and phrases used? #weight=1
Rating 1: 1-A very limited range of transitional words and phrases are used.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: 3-Many inadequate transitional words and phrases are used.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: 5-Most transitional words and phrases are used appropriately.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: 7-Transitional words and phrases are used appropriately.
|
3
|
Language
|
l WORDING AND SENTENCE SKILLS: Is the essay concise? Are there a variety of sentence structures in the essay? Are there any errors regarding gender, tense, agreement, comparative construction, non-predicate verb, parallel structure, inconsistent point of view in the essay? Please describe the type of problem including the location of one instance and how they should be fixed.
u Word Choice:Words convey the intended message in a specific, precise, and engaging manner. #weight=1
Rating 1: Words are too limited or difficult to understand. Rating 2: 2 Rating 3: Many words are not understandable. Rating 4: 4 Rating 5: Most words are understandable and specific in this context. Rating 6: 6 Rating 7: Words are specific, precise and engaging. u Word Count:Does the essay meet the requirement of word tokens? #weight=1
Rating 1: Less than 100 words. Rating 2: 2 Rating 3: At least 100 words but less than 140 words. Rating 4: 4 Rating 5: At least 140 words but less than 180 words. Rating 6: 6 Rating 7: At least 180 words and no more than 250 words. u Sentence Structure: Are there a variety of sentence structures in the essay? #weight=1
Rating 1: A very limited range of sentence structures.
Rating 2: 2
Rating 3: A limited range of sentence structures with some improper usages.
Rating 4: 4
Rating 5: A variety of sentence structures with few errors.
Rating 6: 6
Rating 7: A wide range of sentence structures with full flexibility and accuracy.
|
4
|
Mechanics
|
l Are there any common problems in terms of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraphing in the essay? Please describe the type of problem including the location of one instance and indicate how it should be fixed.
u Writing Convention: Standard writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing) are used effectively to enhance readability in the essay. #weight=1
Rating 1: There are many serious errors in standard writing conventions; these errors frequently obscure meaning.
Rating 2: 2 Rating 3: There are occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in standard writing conventions; these errors can interfere with meaning. Three to five errors might occur per paragraph. Rating 4: 4 Rating 5: There is one or two errors in standard writing conventions per paragraph. Rating 6: 6 Rating 7: There is few or no errors in standard writing conventions per paragraph. |
附件:
第一届参赛资源包(点击下载)
第二届参赛资源包(点击下载)